PEMILIHAN MODEL MANAJEMEN PROYEK ERP HYBRID MENGGUNAKAN MULTI CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA)

Nafisa Devi Nur Rusydah; Roji Rohmatillah; Muhammad Ainul Yaqin

doi:10.33772/anoatik.v4i1.131

Penulis

Nafisa Devi Nur Rusydah UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Roji Rohmatillah Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
Muhammad Ainul Yaqin Program Studi Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33772/anoatik.v4i1.131

Abstrak

Pemilihan model manajemen proyek Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) menjadi faktor penting karena implementasi ERP memiliki tingkat kompleksitas dan risiko kegagalan yang tinggi. Namun, proses pemilihan metodologi manajemen proyek masih sering dilakukan berdasarkan preferensi organisasi tanpa mempertimbangkan karakteristik proyek secara spesifik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan model seleksi adaptif berbasis karakteristik proyek untuk menentukan metodologi manajemen proyek ERP yang paling sesuai. Metode yang digunakan adalah Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) yang mengintegrasikan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) menggunakan pendekatan scenario-based weighting. Simulasi dilakukan menggunakan Project Management Risk Raw Dataset yang terdiri atas 4000 data proyek simulasi dengan enam kriteria utama, yaitu stabilitas kebutuhan, kompleksitas sistem, kesiapan Agile, risiko, dokumentasi, dan keterlibatan stakeholder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model Hybrid B (Agile iterations dengan tata kelola formal) menjadi model paling dominan dengan tingkat rekomendasi sebesar 47,45%, diikuti Agile sebesar 45,53%, sedangkan alternatif lainnya menunjukkan tingkat rekomendasi yang lebih rendah. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan hybrid lebih adaptif untuk diterapkan pada proyek ERP modern yang dinamis.

Kata Kunci:

ERP, MCDA, AHP, TOPSIS, manajemen proyek hybrid

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

S. Panjavongroj and B. Phruksaphanrat, “Selection of ERP system and the best practice by hybrid method: A case study of Thai automotive supply chain network,” IFS, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 7617–7631, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3233/JIFS-221476.

M. G. Panji Wicaksono, I. E. Aditya, P. E. Putra, I. B. Putu Angga Pranindhana, and P. O. Hadi Putra, “Critical Success Factor Analysis ERP Project Implementation Using Analytical Hierarchy Process in Consumer Goods Company,” in 2022 5th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE), Jakarta, Indonesia: IEEE, Sep. 2022, pp. 41–46. doi: 10.1109/IC2IE56416.2022.9970013.

L. Gren, A. Wong, and E. Kristoffersson, “Choosing Agile or Plan-Driven Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementations -- A Study on 21 Implementations from 20 Companies,” 2019, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1906.05220.

Z. Ghinafikar, M. M. Mu’thy, and M. A. Yaqin, “Perbandingan Metode Agile Dan Waterfall Berdasarkan Analisis Waktu Pengembangan Sistem,” JENTIK, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–44, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.70038/jentik.v3i1.149.

X. Zhang, “A Hybrid Cloud ERP Framework For Processing Purchasing Data,” Feb. 22, 2022, arXiv: arXiv:2202.10786. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2202.10786.

J. V. G. A. Araujo et al., “Multi-criteria Decision Support Method AHP-TOPSIS-2N applied in bids to improve the control of public expenses,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 221, pp. 362–369, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.07.049.

B. G. Demircan and K. Yetilmezsoy, “A Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Implementation of Smart Sustainable Waste Management Strategies,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 6526, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15086526.

M. A. Khasawneh and F. Dweiri, “Analyzing the Digital Infrastructure Enabling Project Management Success: A Hybrid FAHP-FTOPSIS Approach,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 8080, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14178080.

B. K. Khotimah, D. R. Anamisa, Y. Kustiyahningsih, A. N. Fauziah, and E. Setiawan, “Enhancing Small and Medium Enterprises: A Hybrid Clustering and AHP-TOPSIS Decision Support Framework,” ISI, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 313–321, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.18280/isi.290131.

“Open-Source ERP Systems Selection: An Integrated Method based on Fuzzy AHP -TOPSIS,” JLISS, vol. 10, no. 4, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.33168/JLISS.2023.0416.

B. Dağci Yüksel and F. Ersöz, “Evaluation of ERP Software Selection Criteria with Fuzzy AHP Approach: An Application in the Metal Production Enterprises in the Aviation Industry,” Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2656–2667, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13198-024-02287-x.

M. Sequeira, A. Adlemo, and P. Hilletofth, “A Hybrid Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS Model for Evaluation of Manufacturing Relocation Decisions,” Oper Manag Res, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 164–191, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12063-022-00284-6.

Z. (Justin) Zhang, P. R. Srivastava, P. Eachempati, and Y. Yu, “An Intelligent Framework for Analyzing Supply Chain Resilience of Firms in China: A Hybrid Multicriteria Approach,” IJLM, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 443–472, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-11-2020-0452.

S. Avikal, M. Nigam, and M. Ram, “A Hybrid Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach for Consultant Selection Problem in ERP Project,” Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag, vol. 13, no. S2, pp. 941–950, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01505-0.

K. Wang, Z. Ying, S. S. Goswami, Y. Yin, and Y. Zhao, “Investigating the Role of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in the Construction Industry Using a Delphi-ANP-TOPSIS Hybrid MCDM Concept under a Fuzzy Environment,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 15, p. 11848, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151511848.

Kaggledata, “Project Management Risk Raw.” Kaggle, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ka66ledata/project-management-risk-raw